411-movie news

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Thursday, 25 February 2010

On a small point of physics

Posted on 07:17 by anderson
Usually I let scientific errors in comics roll off my back like complaints off a Southwest Airlines Customer Service representative. I mean after all, when you're dealing with a book where people can fly and have x-ray vision, complaining about the speed of light being unbreakable is a little hypocritical.

But occasionally I come across one I feel the need to comment on.  In JSA 36, Jesse Quick and Baroness Blitzkrieg are having a brief high-speed chase/fight.  Baroness B remarks that she doen't have to engage in fisticuffs with Jesse, she only has to "spread a number of obstacles in your path".  She pulls a bunch of super-bounce balls from her satchel and tosses them in Jesse's path.  The result, as Baroness explains that at the speed she's running, they hit her like bullets.  Good idea.

Small problem.  At the time she releases them, they're both running, at almost the same exact speed.  If two objects are traveling at the same speed, relative to each other, they aren't moving.  If one is moving at 500 MPH and the other at 501 MPH, the second one is only moving at 1 MPH, relative to the first.

So if Baroness releases the balls (there's no way to write that without sounding dirty), they're traveling at the same speed as the two runners, and in the time it takes for Jesse to plow into them,  they haven't slowed down enough to strike her with much velocity at all.  They'd be minor annoyances.  Still something that could make her lose her stride and tumble (especially considering she's relatively new to speedstering, and doesn't have the reflexes, friction aura or ability to vibrate through obstacles of the flashes), but not enough to hit her "with the force of wrecing balls".  If Blitzkrieg had been standing still and done the same, then yes, Jesses would have plowed into them at whatever speed she was running, and would have hurt like hell. Indeed, they might have just cut right through her, were she not able to avoid them.  Of course, being bouncy-balls, a few might have bunced right back at Blitzkrieg and hit HER at Jesse's speed, having absorbed her kinetic energy.  So, not as good an idea.  Still, an elegant move, as Baroness calls it, tho.

I recall a story decades back that dealt with relativistic speeds of moving objects that got it RIGHT, but nobody could understand why it worked.  John Ostrander did a mini about the cops of Gotham City (might have been called GCPD; too lazy to look it up).  In the last scene there was a riot which the cops quickly quelled.  Gordon mentions there were guns in the crowd, but most shots were fired in the air and injuries were from bruises as the bullets fell back down from the sky.  People on Compuserve (an antiquated communication system similar to smoke signals) were asking how those bullets didn't kill anyone. After all, they're bullets.

I had to step in and explain that John had gotten it right, as he usually does.  If a bullet is fired straight up, gravity starts to slow it down at the rate of g, or 9.8 meters per second per second.  Once it comes to a halt, it starts to fall back down at that speed, but the bullet does not now have the terrific force of the gun's propulsion behind it.  It's going to come down as it it had just been dropped from that height, which considering its small size and air resistance, is going to cause no more than a sharp sting if it hits anyone.

As you can see, I clearly have too much time on my hands.
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to Facebook
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • On the Annotated Animated All-Stars
    Children in Need is a stellar charity from Great Britain dedicated to helping disadvantaged kids in the UK. It's been going for over 20...
  • On the need to change without actually improving
    The Batman Annual, part of the pretty damn good if I say so Night of the Owls Bat-event features the New 52 origin of Mr. Freeze, who played...
  • On the possible end to a very long story.
    I was announced late on Friday (so late that few of the comics websites have addressed it yet) that DC and  Warner Brothers retains control ...
  • On what happens when you give someone the job they were born to do
    The idea of nobody dying in comics was really put in place by the Comics code - Most pre-code superheroes were quite calavier about killing ...
  • On the introduction of a very specific change to a major character
    Of all the announcements from this weekend's Kapow! Comic Convention in Britain, the one that has set the most lips flapping is the anno...
  • On the Danger of Feeding the Trolls
    As you may know, a lot of episodes of the early days of television are lost, presumably forever.  Partially as a cost-saving measure, and pa...
  • On the importance of jumping only to the right conclusions
    A bit of a change in theme today - this is a film review, in association with The Wife's "The Best Hitchcock Films Hitchcock Never...
  • On what may be the dictionary definition of the Shaggy Dog Story
    Second Grade.  The Weekly Reader flier came through, and in it was the novelization for "the major motion picture" Digby, the Bigg...
  • On not knowing when you've gone too far, save for the sound of the screaming
    Comic and "pop culture" website Newsarama, used to have informative articles, well thought out histories of characters, and, yes, ...
  • On the latest chapter in a thousand year long tale
    You ever see that cut scene from Pulp Fiction where Mia Wallace talks about "Beatles people and Elvis people"? People like Elvis, ...

Categories

  • Captain Marvel
  • Julie Newmar
  • Justice League
  • My Living Doll
  • Shazam

Blog Archive

  • ►  2013 (1)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2012 (21)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (2)
    • ►  May (8)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  March (4)
    • ►  February (4)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2011 (28)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  August (2)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (3)
    • ►  April (5)
    • ►  March (1)
    • ►  February (6)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ▼  2010 (31)
    • ►  December (2)
    • ►  November (5)
    • ►  October (3)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (4)
    • ►  June (4)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  March (2)
    • ▼  February (3)
      • On a small point of physics
      • On being given an unsolicited opportunity to under...
      • On analyzing the success of a bold experiment
    • ►  January (4)
  • ►  2009 (42)
    • ►  December (2)
    • ►  November (3)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  September (5)
    • ►  August (5)
    • ►  July (5)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (4)
    • ►  March (15)
  • ►  2007 (3)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (2)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

anderson
View my complete profile